BMC Links Patients to Outpatient Addiction Treatment Services

Caregivers at Boston Medical Center (BMC) have released a study outlining how the hospital’s Addiction Consult Service (ACS) may be making a significant dent in the problem of inpatients with substance use disorder (SUD) relapsing into addiction – and being readmitted – shortly after discharge.

Numerous studies have shown that many inpatients (15% by one Massachusetts study) have an active SUD, and that they’re likely to be readmitted within 30 days of discharge. But treating a patient for substance use disorder in addition to whatever other forms of treatment the hospital is providing often does not occur.

“Barriers to inpatient initiation of medications for [opioid use disorder] include the limited availability of outpatient providers and programs, lack of insurance coverage, and federal privacy regulations that make coordinating and integrating medical and addiction care difficult,” BMC researchers wrote in the Journal of Substance Use Treatment.

To address the problem, BMC created its Addiction Consult Service in July 2015. The physician-RN ACS team meets with the patient, provides brief bedside counseling, initiates addiction-treatment medications, and formulates discharge planning.

“Discharge work for the ACS included collaborating with the primary hospital medical team, social work, and hospital case management, as well as coordination with and linkage to post-discharge addiction providers,” according to the study. “The ACS regularly collaborated with social work within the hospital and held weekly joint rounds with the Psychiatry Consult and Liaison service.”

Two BMC outpatient clinics and three local methadone clinics were the main post-discharge linkages.

BMC reports that over the first 26 weeks, the ASC received 367 referrals resulting in 337 consults. (Some patients left against medical advice, refused to be seen, etc.)

“Like heart disease can cause a heart attack or a stroke, addiction causes many acute injuries requiring immediate attention, but we can’t simply treat that issue without delving deeper to address the root cause,” said Alex Walley, MD, MSc, a general internist at BMC’s Grayken Center for Addiction who also oversees the addiction medicine fellowship. “Our goal is to engage willing patients in treatment and work with them on a plan that will keep them healthy and safe now and in the future.”

MHA’s V.P. of Clinical Affairs Pat Noga, RN, FAAN, who is involved in the association’s work on opioids, said BMC’s ACS work is well-known within the caregiving community and provides a template for work by other hospitals or state efforts going forward.

Click on the link to read the full study: Addiction consultation services – Linking hospitalized patients to outpatient addiction treatment.

And click here to read about the efforts of MHA’s Substance Use Disorder Prevention and Treatment Task Force that has developed guidelines for hospital to use in addressing the opioid crisis.

MHA’s CARE Act Guidance – Updated Materials

The Caregiver Advise, Record & Enable (CARE) Act (Chapter 332 of the Acts of 2016), effective November 8, is intended to allow patients over the age of 18, who have been admitted as an inpatient at an acute care hospital, to designate a caregiver and give permission for the hospital to provide medical information to that caregiver.

Materials, Fact Sheet and FAQs can be found here…

 

Preventing Substance Use Starts at Home-Safeguarding Your Children

When it comes to drugs and alcohol, many parents worry aboutinfluences from the outside world, like the media and their
children’s friends. But what can be found inside your home is just as important — youth say that the family home can be a major
source of substances like prescription drugs, alcohol, and inhalants.

Take a tour of your home >>>>

Take steps to protect your children:

  • Learn about risky substances, and how to safeguard your children.
  • Go through your home and identify substances that might be misused.
  • Replace or remove risky products when possible.
  • Put risky substances in secure places and supervise your children if they have to use them.
  • Watch your children for possible signs of misuse. Talk about your concerns, and get help if needed.

Get the Preventing-Drug-Abuse-Starts-at-Home - Safeguarding Your Children here... 

 

7 Ways to protect your Teens from Alcohol & Other Drugs – A Parent’s Guide

  1. BE A ROLE MODEL

    Teens watch their parents. Your example helps to guide their choices.

  2. BE CLEAR ABOUT YOUR EXPECTATIONS

    The most common reason young people give for not using alcohol and drugs is not wanting to harm their relationship with adults in their lives.

  3. SET LIMITS AND FOLLOW THROUGH

    Teens whose parents set clear rules and follow through with consequences are less likely to use alcohol and other drugs.

  4. BE INVOLVED IN YOUR KID’S LIFE

    Teens are much less likely to use drugs when parents are involved in their lives.

  5. HELP YOUR TEEN BECOME WELL-ROUNDED

    Teens who participate in community service and extracurricular activities are less likely to be involved with drugs and alcohol.

  6. ENCOURAGE YOUR TEEN TO TRY HARD IN SCHOOL

    Teens that perform well in school are less likely to become involved with alcohol and drugs.

  7. REACH OUT

    It takes a village. Teens that have support from a variety of adults are less likely to use alcohol and other drugs.

Get the entire Patrent's Guide here...

ICU Harm

ICU Harm Related Topics

The critical care unit can be the location where a patient harm event occurs or it can be the unit where patients are transferred following an event elsewhere. With this in mind, we have grouped the following Patnership for Patients (PfP) option year (or Leading Edge Advanced Practive Topics – LEAPT) topics together under “ICU Harm Related Topics”: Failure to Rescue, Hospital Acquired Acute Renal Failure, Iatrogenic Delirium, and Sepsis. A brief description of each topic is provided below. More detail, along with strategies and tools for improvement are included in each of the topic change packages.


Failure to Rescue

Failure to rescue refers to the lack of a caregiver’s ability to recognize early signs and symptoms of deterioration in a patient’s condition, or acting too late to prevent a cardiac arrest. It is a measure of the degree to which providers respond to adverse events that develop on their watch, and may reflect the quality of monitoring, the effectiveness of actions taken once complications are recognized, or both. Three fundamental problems lead to failure to rescue in hospitals:

  • Failure to plan or be ready for unexpected deterioration in patient conditions
  • Failure to recognize early warning signs and symptoms of impending deterioration in patients
  • Failure to respond to patients in distress in a timely and systematic manner

Hospital Acquired Acute Renal Failure

Acute Renal Failure (ARF) is predominately an acquired hospital disorder and the high mortality rate of patients with ARF cannot be explained entirely by the comorbid conditions of these patients. Hospital acquired ARF occurs in 22-67% of critically ill patients and is a significant indicator of mortality, morbidity and increased health care costs. Mortality from ARF ranges from 25-80% with the elderly having the highest mortality. The largest percentage of hospital acquired ARF is caused by ischemic or toxic exposure.
Prevention of hospital acquired ARF is critical to the early recognition of acute kidney injury (AKI) to minimize the progression of AKI to ARF.

References

Venkataraman, Ramesh, MD, and John Kellum, MD. “Prevention of Acute Renal Failure.” Chest 131.1 (2005): 300–08.

Kellum, John A., and Derek C. Angus. “Patients Are Dying of Acute Renal Failure *.” Critical Care Medicine 30.9 (2002): 2156-15


Iatrogenic Delirium

Iatrogenic delirium (acute state of confusion) is a common and severe neuropsychiatric syndrome with core features of acute onset and fluctuating course, attentional deficits, and generalized severe disorganization of behavior acquired in the hospital. Iatrogenic delirium may be the single most common acute disorder affecting adults in general hospitals. It affects 10-20% of all hospitalized adults, 30-40% of elderly hospitalized patients, and up to 80% of ICU patients. Iatrogenic delirium increases the risk of longer stays in the hospital, higher cost of care, death, and more long-term cognitive impairment up to one year later.

Delirium detection in the hospital setting is critical in the ability to understand the incidence and then therefore the treatment. Iatrogenic delirium prevention strategies are relatively limited- sleep protocols and early ambulation. The ABCDE bundle is one way to align and coordinate care, which includes specific focus on delirium as a component of the overall care patients receive, including sedation and pain medications, breathing machines, and mobilization.

Read more…


Resources

CDC Antimicrobial Stewardship Tools

AHRQ Toolkit for Reduction of Clostridium difficile Infections Through Antimicrobial Stewardship

APIC Guide to Reducing Clostridium difficile Infections


Procedural Harm – Blood Management Top Ten Evidence Based Interventions

HRET’s Reducing Over-Utilization of Blood & Blood Products – 2014 Change Package

Airway Safety Top Ten Evidenced Based Interventions

Undue Radiation Exposure Top Ten Evidenced Based Interventions

HRET’s Preventing Undue Radiation Exposure – 2018 Change Package

Acute Renal Failure/Acute Kidney Injury Top Ten Evidenced Based Interventions 

HRET’s Prevention of Hospital Acquired Acute Renal Failure/Acute Kidney Injury – 2014 Change Package

Iatrogenic Delirium Top Ten Evidenced Based Interventions

HRET’s Preventing Iatrogenic Delirium – 2018 Change Package

Newton-Wellesley Hospital’s Journey to High Reliability

Newton-Wellesley Hospital’s Bert Thurlo-Walsh, R.N., MM, CPHQ, Assoc. CQO/V.P., Patient Experience & Medical Staff Services and Dr. Janet C. Larson, Chief Quality & Experience Officer were invited to the Health Research and Educational Trust (HRET) Hospital Improvement Innovation Network (HIIN) The Journey Ahead national conference in San Diego last month to present their hospital's poster on their journey to become a high reliability organization (HRO).  

 The HRET/HIIN conference preceded the American Hospital Association’s leadership conference.poster presentation on the hospital’s journey to become a high-reliability organization (HRO) was featured

HIIN comprises 32 state hospital associations, including MHA, and more than 1,600 hospitals collaborating to reduce inpatient harm and readmissions. For participating hospitals, HIIN provides, among other benefits, guidance and assistance for becoming an HRO.

High-reliability organizations operate in complex, high-hazard domains for extended periods without serious accidents or catastrophic failures. To become an HRO, an organization does not merely follow certain best practice processes for improving safety, but also changes its culture, ensuring that everyone on staff is ever-mindful of the need to relentlessly prioritize safety.

Newton-Wellesley’s presentation outlined its challenges—executive leadership changes and solid but stagnant patient experience and staff engagement scores—and the following steps taken toward becoming an HRO:

  • Dr. Michael R. Jaff, who became Newton-Wellesley Hospital president in October 2016, immediately made the delivery of high-quality, safe care with a great experience a primary strategy for the hospital. To achieve this strategy, Dr. Jaff focused the team on high-reliability and the elimination of harm.
  • Jaff created two new positions—Chief Quality & Experience Officer and Associate Chief Quality Officer, VP of Patient Experience and Medical Staff Services—to lead the high-reliability strategy.
  • Newton-Wellesley leveraged other hospitals in the Partners HealthCare System that had already undertaken the high-reliability journey to learn about their experiences. A core team at Newton-Wellesley then drew up strategic plans for each component of the HRO framework, along with a roadmap for implementation of each tactic.
  • Throughout the process, the hospital participated in MHA’s Clinical Issues Advisory Council and the MHA-led HIIN. It completed the Joint Commission’s Center for Transforming Healthcare ORO 2.0 tool to assist with further defining the roadmap.
  • Newton-Wellesley also added Patient Family Advisory Council members to the Patient Safety Steering Committee, and the Experience/Engagement Work Group.

The Newton-Wellesley team underscored the following key takeaways:

  • First and foremost, the journey toward HRO has no end; rather it is a continuous, never-ending journey.
  • Top leadership needs to make HRO a focus.
  • It’s important to set the quality goal as “zero harm.”
  • It is imperative to develop a “roadmap” for implementation and to use robust process improvement tools to hold leadership and staff accountable.
  • Adding patient and family advisory council members to the process through active participation in key committees also proved invaluable to Newton-Wellesley’s effort.

RI’s Westerly Hospital’s Remarkable Infection-Reduction Performance Zero

That’s the number of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) that Westerly Hospital in Rhode Island has experienced in both its ICU and medical/surgery units from 2015 to today. Its performance in containing catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) is equally as remarkable; in the hospital’s ICU and med/surg units there has been just one CAUTI, in the ICU, since 2016.

Westerly Hospital – a 125-bed facility that is part of Yale New Haven Health system – implemented a nurse-driven protocol to combat CAUTI. The hospital used guidelines developed by the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) – the federal panel that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). From that, Westerly developed a CAUTI prevention algorithm for registered nurses to use, essentially to help them decide: does the patient still need the catheter or should it be removed? Such a determination could be based on a patient, say, being transferred from an ICU to another unit.

RNs assess patients on a daily, or shift, basis and follow best practices relating to removal protocols. Daily interdisciplinary rounds include reviews of all patients with urinary catheters to verify clinical indications.

“An important component is having online learning modules that educate the staff on the procedures,” said Patricia Egan, Westerly’s Nursing Professional Development Specialist. “The modules also produce a transcript that managers can use to verify that each person in the unit has passed the online lessons.” Staff were also trained in the use of the algorithm in 1:1 sessions with Nurse Leaders and Professional Development Staff.

To prevent CLABSI, Westerly set up learning stations which are essentially mock patients so that managers could observe staff performing “hands on” central IV line care and maintenance. Staff were also educated on best practices and participated in on-line learning modules. The hospitals also implemented daily Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) bathing for all patients with central lines – which is recommended best practice by the CDC.

Westerly’s infection fighting strategy was developed by an inter-disciplinary team consisting of the Quality and Risk Management department, front line RNs, and Nurse Leaders. The successes are shared with staff through Westerly’s Infection Prevention Committee.

“New staff are trained on the procedures, and now that we are two years into our successful program, we are re-training all staff,” Egan said. “The program has been good for our staff, good for the hospital by avoiding value-based penalties, but especially beneficial for our patients.”

AHA’s Combating Violence in Our Communities and Our Hospitals

Our communities must work together to combat all forms of violence, now viewed as one of the major public health and safety issues throughout the country. Community action programs such as those being undertaken by our nation’s hospitals and health systems (alone and with others) are needed now more than ever to help address violence and the toll it takes on our communities and hospital colleagues.

Explore  AHA's Cost of Community Violence to Hospitals and Health Systems in this July 2017 Report   for information on national, state and local efforts to help end violence in our communities, and to help hospitals.

 

BID-Needham Sustaining Change: Creating a Hospital Culture of Safety

In 2013, during a period of significant institutional growth, Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital–Needham (BID–Needham) began an organization-wide effort to enhance its commitment to patient safety, employee engagement, and patient and staff satisfaction.

As a result if its efforts, BID-Needham’s scores on the AHRQ Culture of Safety Survey rose to the 98th percentile rank within one year of implementation and have been sustained since then, with the hospital’s 2016 survey scores remaining in the 96th percentile. This effort was led by the hospital’s executive leadership team with the engagement and full support of the board of directors.

For its efforts, BID–Needham was the winning entry in the “Enhancing Culture and Leadership” category of the 2017 MHA Compass Awards. Entries in each of the six Compass Award categories were voted on by non-Massachusetts judges from across the U.S., who assessed the entries “blind” – meaning there were no details to identify the hospital competing.

Since 2010, BID–Needham has conducted, through an approved vendor, the Culture of Safety survey. In 2013, the hospital set out to evaluate the hospital’s culture and the physicians’ and employees’ feelings about workplace satisfaction. Over the next year, a comprehensive evaluation of existing processes, procedures and behaviors was conducted throughout the hospital with a message to all staff and physicians of a renewed commitment to patient safety and staff engagement to find solutions.

Following the broad assessment, a hospital initiative entitled “Drive” was developed in partnership with leadership and direct line staff members. Drive focused on leadership development and accountability, employee engagement, and improving the patient experience. As part of the cultural transformation process, goals included increasing transparency and consistency of communication, creating a just and learning culture and encouraging confidence in the safety event reporting system and follow-up. Multi-disciplinary workgroups were implemented and included leadership and direct care givers. Commitment to patient safety was always central to the goals.

Since implementing the initiative BID–Needham has seen sustainment of staff confidence in the safety culture as well as improved job satisfaction. Additionally, because of the improved transparency of communication and teamwork, the hospital is able to respond more quickly and be proactive when it identifies potential problems via monthly quality surveillance (e.g., fall prevention, skin integrity, and medication events). Patient satisfaction, through HCAHPS scores, has seen consistent improvement.

Asked in the Compass Award application to list the three lessons learned, BID–Needham wrote: 1) Leadership and Board support are essential for driving transformational changes; 2) Staff engagement and partnership with leadership is essential to driving sustainable change; and 3) Transformational change occurs with commitment and organizational purpose.

Making a Decision About Your Care

QUALITY CORNER: MAKING A DECISION ABOUT YOUR CARE

Often at some point in a person's healthcare, serious discussions must occur about what level of life-sustaining care the patient wants or how care should be provided in the event the patient is no longer able to make decisions for him or herself.

Such decisions are profoundly difficult for patients and families. But if the issue is not resolved, it often becomes difficult for caregivers who can become caught between their professional responsibilities and the competing opinions within a patient's family.

In the commonwealth, Honoring Choices Massachusetts is the group that helps people ensure that their healthcare choices are understood and honored throughout their lives. Among the collaborating partners of Honoring Choices Massachusetts is MHA; the Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST), which MHA has supported; as well as the Hospice & Palliative Care Federation of Massachusetts, and the Massachusetts Council of Churches.

There are many components to creating a good healthcare decision plan. For example, it's important to sign a Healthcare Proxy, which is the legal document though which you appoint a trusted friend or relative known as a Healthcare Agent to make healthcare decisions for you if you are not able to make effective decisions for yourself. Concurrently, it's important to draw up a Personal Directive, which is a personal document or statement in which you give your Healthcare Agent information and instructions about the kind of medical care you want in the future. The previous steps cover medical decisions, but it's also important to create a Durable Power of Attorney, which is a legal document in which you appoint a trusted person to manage and protect your financial matters if you aren't able to do so for yourself.

At the same time, people should fill out a MOLST form, which is a medical document that communicates your decisions about life-sustaining treatments to your care providers. It tells the care team that you and your doctor or care provider have discussed your current medical condition and the role of life-sustaining treatments, and that you made decisions about the treatments you want or do not want. Anyone involved in your care will follow the MOLST form.

Links to the forms and in-depth explanations of them, are available through the resource page of Honoring Choices Massachusetts. "Confronting a serious illness, or preparing for a time when we are unable to make decisions for ourselves, is difficult and a source of anxiety for many," said MHA's Noga. "But entering into such a difficult period without a plan about how we wish to be cared for multiplies the anxiety for families and for caregivers. It's important to make choices and that's why MHA is such a strong supporter of healthcare decisions."