ICU Harm

ICU Harm Related Topics

The critical care unit can be the location where a patient harm event occurs or it can be the unit where patients are transferred following an event elsewhere. With this in mind, we have grouped the following Patnership for Patients (PfP) option year (or Leading Edge Advanced Practive Topics – LEAPT) topics together under “ICU Harm Related Topics”: Failure to Rescue, Hospital Acquired Acute Renal Failure, Iatrogenic Delirium, and Sepsis. A brief description of each topic is provided below. More detail, along with strategies and tools for improvement are included in each of the topic change packages.


Failure to Rescue

Failure to rescue refers to the lack of a caregiver’s ability to recognize early signs and symptoms of deterioration in a patient’s condition, or acting too late to prevent a cardiac arrest. It is a measure of the degree to which providers respond to adverse events that develop on their watch, and may reflect the quality of monitoring, the effectiveness of actions taken once complications are recognized, or both. Three fundamental problems lead to failure to rescue in hospitals:

  • Failure to plan or be ready for unexpected deterioration in patient conditions
  • Failure to recognize early warning signs and symptoms of impending deterioration in patients
  • Failure to respond to patients in distress in a timely and systematic manner

Hospital Acquired Acute Renal Failure

Acute Renal Failure (ARF) is predominately an acquired hospital disorder and the high mortality rate of patients with ARF cannot be explained entirely by the comorbid conditions of these patients. Hospital acquired ARF occurs in 22-67% of critically ill patients and is a significant indicator of mortality, morbidity and increased health care costs. Mortality from ARF ranges from 25-80% with the elderly having the highest mortality. The largest percentage of hospital acquired ARF is caused by ischemic or toxic exposure.
Prevention of hospital acquired ARF is critical to the early recognition of acute kidney injury (AKI) to minimize the progression of AKI to ARF.

References

Venkataraman, Ramesh, MD, and John Kellum, MD. “Prevention of Acute Renal Failure.” Chest 131.1 (2005): 300–08.

Kellum, John A., and Derek C. Angus. “Patients Are Dying of Acute Renal Failure *.” Critical Care Medicine 30.9 (2002): 2156-15


Iatrogenic Delirium

Iatrogenic delirium (acute state of confusion) is a common and severe neuropsychiatric syndrome with core features of acute onset and fluctuating course, attentional deficits, and generalized severe disorganization of behavior acquired in the hospital. Iatrogenic delirium may be the single most common acute disorder affecting adults in general hospitals. It affects 10-20% of all hospitalized adults, 30-40% of elderly hospitalized patients, and up to 80% of ICU patients. Iatrogenic delirium increases the risk of longer stays in the hospital, higher cost of care, death, and more long-term cognitive impairment up to one year later.

Delirium detection in the hospital setting is critical in the ability to understand the incidence and then therefore the treatment. Iatrogenic delirium prevention strategies are relatively limited- sleep protocols and early ambulation. The ABCDE bundle is one way to align and coordinate care, which includes specific focus on delirium as a component of the overall care patients receive, including sedation and pain medications, breathing machines, and mobilization.

Read more…


Resources

CDC Antimicrobial Stewardship Tools

AHRQ Toolkit for Reduction of Clostridium difficile Infections Through Antimicrobial Stewardship

APIC Guide to Reducing Clostridium difficile Infections


Procedural Harm – Blood Management Top Ten Evidence Based Interventions

HRET’s Reducing Over-Utilization of Blood & Blood Products – 2014 Change Package

Airway Safety Top Ten Evidenced Based Interventions

Undue Radiation Exposure Top Ten Evidenced Based Interventions

HRET’s Preventing Undue Radiation Exposure – 2018 Change Package

Acute Renal Failure/Acute Kidney Injury Top Ten Evidenced Based Interventions 

HRET’s Prevention of Hospital Acquired Acute Renal Failure/Acute Kidney Injury – 2014 Change Package

Iatrogenic Delirium Top Ten Evidenced Based Interventions

HRET’s Preventing Iatrogenic Delirium – 2018 Change Package

Newton-Wellesley Hospital’s Journey to High Reliability

Newton-Wellesley Hospital’s Bert Thurlo-Walsh, R.N., MM, CPHQ, Assoc. CQO/V.P., Patient Experience & Medical Staff Services and Dr. Janet C. Larson, Chief Quality & Experience Officer were invited to the Health Research and Educational Trust (HRET) Hospital Improvement Innovation Network (HIIN) The Journey Ahead national conference in San Diego last month to present their hospital's poster on their journey to become a high reliability organization (HRO).  

 The HRET/HIIN conference preceded the American Hospital Association’s leadership conference.poster presentation on the hospital’s journey to become a high-reliability organization (HRO) was featured

HIIN comprises 32 state hospital associations, including MHA, and more than 1,600 hospitals collaborating to reduce inpatient harm and readmissions. For participating hospitals, HIIN provides, among other benefits, guidance and assistance for becoming an HRO.

High-reliability organizations operate in complex, high-hazard domains for extended periods without serious accidents or catastrophic failures. To become an HRO, an organization does not merely follow certain best practice processes for improving safety, but also changes its culture, ensuring that everyone on staff is ever-mindful of the need to relentlessly prioritize safety.

Newton-Wellesley’s presentation outlined its challenges—executive leadership changes and solid but stagnant patient experience and staff engagement scores—and the following steps taken toward becoming an HRO:

  • Dr. Michael R. Jaff, who became Newton-Wellesley Hospital president in October 2016, immediately made the delivery of high-quality, safe care with a great experience a primary strategy for the hospital. To achieve this strategy, Dr. Jaff focused the team on high-reliability and the elimination of harm.
  • Jaff created two new positions—Chief Quality & Experience Officer and Associate Chief Quality Officer, VP of Patient Experience and Medical Staff Services—to lead the high-reliability strategy.
  • Newton-Wellesley leveraged other hospitals in the Partners HealthCare System that had already undertaken the high-reliability journey to learn about their experiences. A core team at Newton-Wellesley then drew up strategic plans for each component of the HRO framework, along with a roadmap for implementation of each tactic.
  • Throughout the process, the hospital participated in MHA’s Clinical Issues Advisory Council and the MHA-led HIIN. It completed the Joint Commission’s Center for Transforming Healthcare ORO 2.0 tool to assist with further defining the roadmap.
  • Newton-Wellesley also added Patient Family Advisory Council members to the Patient Safety Steering Committee, and the Experience/Engagement Work Group.

The Newton-Wellesley team underscored the following key takeaways:

  • First and foremost, the journey toward HRO has no end; rather it is a continuous, never-ending journey.
  • Top leadership needs to make HRO a focus.
  • It’s important to set the quality goal as “zero harm.”
  • It is imperative to develop a “roadmap” for implementation and to use robust process improvement tools to hold leadership and staff accountable.
  • Adding patient and family advisory council members to the process through active participation in key committees also proved invaluable to Newton-Wellesley’s effort.

RI’s Westerly Hospital’s Remarkable Infection-Reduction Performance Zero

That’s the number of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) that Westerly Hospital in Rhode Island has experienced in both its ICU and medical/surgery units from 2015 to today. Its performance in containing catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) is equally as remarkable; in the hospital’s ICU and med/surg units there has been just one CAUTI, in the ICU, since 2016.

Westerly Hospital – a 125-bed facility that is part of Yale New Haven Health system – implemented a nurse-driven protocol to combat CAUTI. The hospital used guidelines developed by the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) – the federal panel that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). From that, Westerly developed a CAUTI prevention algorithm for registered nurses to use, essentially to help them decide: does the patient still need the catheter or should it be removed? Such a determination could be based on a patient, say, being transferred from an ICU to another unit.

RNs assess patients on a daily, or shift, basis and follow best practices relating to removal protocols. Daily interdisciplinary rounds include reviews of all patients with urinary catheters to verify clinical indications.

“An important component is having online learning modules that educate the staff on the procedures,” said Patricia Egan, Westerly’s Nursing Professional Development Specialist. “The modules also produce a transcript that managers can use to verify that each person in the unit has passed the online lessons.” Staff were also trained in the use of the algorithm in 1:1 sessions with Nurse Leaders and Professional Development Staff.

To prevent CLABSI, Westerly set up learning stations which are essentially mock patients so that managers could observe staff performing “hands on” central IV line care and maintenance. Staff were also educated on best practices and participated in on-line learning modules. The hospitals also implemented daily Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) bathing for all patients with central lines – which is recommended best practice by the CDC.

Westerly’s infection fighting strategy was developed by an inter-disciplinary team consisting of the Quality and Risk Management department, front line RNs, and Nurse Leaders. The successes are shared with staff through Westerly’s Infection Prevention Committee.

“New staff are trained on the procedures, and now that we are two years into our successful program, we are re-training all staff,” Egan said. “The program has been good for our staff, good for the hospital by avoiding value-based penalties, but especially beneficial for our patients.”

AHA’s Combating Violence in Our Communities and Our Hospitals

Our communities must work together to combat all forms of violence, now viewed as one of the major public health and safety issues throughout the country. Community action programs such as those being undertaken by our nation’s hospitals and health systems (alone and with others) are needed now more than ever to help address violence and the toll it takes on our communities and hospital colleagues.

Explore  AHA's Cost of Community Violence to Hospitals and Health Systems in this July 2017 Report   for information on national, state and local efforts to help end violence in our communities, and to help hospitals.

 

BID-Needham Sustaining Change: Creating a Hospital Culture of Safety

In 2013, during a period of significant institutional growth, Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital–Needham (BID–Needham) began an organization-wide effort to enhance its commitment to patient safety, employee engagement, and patient and staff satisfaction.

As a result if its efforts, BID-Needham’s scores on the AHRQ Culture of Safety Survey rose to the 98th percentile rank within one year of implementation and have been sustained since then, with the hospital’s 2016 survey scores remaining in the 96th percentile. This effort was led by the hospital’s executive leadership team with the engagement and full support of the board of directors.

For its efforts, BID–Needham was the winning entry in the “Enhancing Culture and Leadership” category of the 2017 MHA Compass Awards. Entries in each of the six Compass Award categories were voted on by non-Massachusetts judges from across the U.S., who assessed the entries “blind” – meaning there were no details to identify the hospital competing.

Since 2010, BID–Needham has conducted, through an approved vendor, the Culture of Safety survey. In 2013, the hospital set out to evaluate the hospital’s culture and the physicians’ and employees’ feelings about workplace satisfaction. Over the next year, a comprehensive evaluation of existing processes, procedures and behaviors was conducted throughout the hospital with a message to all staff and physicians of a renewed commitment to patient safety and staff engagement to find solutions.

Following the broad assessment, a hospital initiative entitled “Drive” was developed in partnership with leadership and direct line staff members. Drive focused on leadership development and accountability, employee engagement, and improving the patient experience. As part of the cultural transformation process, goals included increasing transparency and consistency of communication, creating a just and learning culture and encouraging confidence in the safety event reporting system and follow-up. Multi-disciplinary workgroups were implemented and included leadership and direct care givers. Commitment to patient safety was always central to the goals.

Since implementing the initiative BID–Needham has seen sustainment of staff confidence in the safety culture as well as improved job satisfaction. Additionally, because of the improved transparency of communication and teamwork, the hospital is able to respond more quickly and be proactive when it identifies potential problems via monthly quality surveillance (e.g., fall prevention, skin integrity, and medication events). Patient satisfaction, through HCAHPS scores, has seen consistent improvement.

Asked in the Compass Award application to list the three lessons learned, BID–Needham wrote: 1) Leadership and Board support are essential for driving transformational changes; 2) Staff engagement and partnership with leadership is essential to driving sustainable change; and 3) Transformational change occurs with commitment and organizational purpose.

Making a Decision About Your Care

QUALITY CORNER: MAKING A DECISION ABOUT YOUR CARE

Often at some point in a person's healthcare, serious discussions must occur about what level of life-sustaining care the patient wants or how care should be provided in the event the patient is no longer able to make decisions for him or herself.

Such decisions are profoundly difficult for patients and families. But if the issue is not resolved, it often becomes difficult for caregivers who can become caught between their professional responsibilities and the competing opinions within a patient's family.

In the commonwealth, Honoring Choices Massachusetts is the group that helps people ensure that their healthcare choices are understood and honored throughout their lives. Among the collaborating partners of Honoring Choices Massachusetts is MHA; the Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST), which MHA has supported; as well as the Hospice & Palliative Care Federation of Massachusetts, and the Massachusetts Council of Churches.

There are many components to creating a good healthcare decision plan. For example, it's important to sign a Healthcare Proxy, which is the legal document though which you appoint a trusted friend or relative known as a Healthcare Agent to make healthcare decisions for you if you are not able to make effective decisions for yourself. Concurrently, it's important to draw up a Personal Directive, which is a personal document or statement in which you give your Healthcare Agent information and instructions about the kind of medical care you want in the future. The previous steps cover medical decisions, but it's also important to create a Durable Power of Attorney, which is a legal document in which you appoint a trusted person to manage and protect your financial matters if you aren't able to do so for yourself.

At the same time, people should fill out a MOLST form, which is a medical document that communicates your decisions about life-sustaining treatments to your care providers. It tells the care team that you and your doctor or care provider have discussed your current medical condition and the role of life-sustaining treatments, and that you made decisions about the treatments you want or do not want. Anyone involved in your care will follow the MOLST form.

Links to the forms and in-depth explanations of them, are available through the resource page of Honoring Choices Massachusetts. "Confronting a serious illness, or preparing for a time when we are unable to make decisions for ourselves, is difficult and a source of anxiety for many," said MHA's Noga. "But entering into such a difficult period without a plan about how we wish to be cared for multiplies the anxiety for families and for caregivers. It's important to make choices and that's why MHA is such a strong supporter of healthcare decisions."

RI’s South Country Hospital’s – Post-Cesarean Care Bundle Reduces Infections

South County Hospital of Wakefield, R.I., in 2014-15 noted a spike in post-cesarean surgical site infections (SSI). An inter-professional team was established to review current practice and opportunities for improvement, and settled on a goal of “zero harm.”

To meet the goal, the hospital made changes to its “Best Practice Care Bundle,” instituted provider and staff education, as well as patient education and communication, and ongoing surveillance.

In order to measure improvement strategies, South County initially implemented small tests of change but did not see significant change in its SSI rates. Then the hospital implemented a series of nurse-driven practices that included:

  • Head to toe sponge bath using Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) cloths pre-operatively for all C-sections;
  • After fetal monitor is removed, cleansing the abdomen with alcohol to remove ultrasonic gel, allowing CHG prep that follows to penetrate skin; and
  • Using real time weights for antibiotic dosing.

Staff used reminder phones calls for CHG wash for planned C-sections and the SSI data was shared continually shared with staff/providers. Educating patients about the risk of SSI was also part of the process.

The results of the new care bundle were impressive. In a 16 month time frame, South County reduced its SSI rate by 87% with a rate of .66 for fiscal year 2016 and for FY 2017 YTD < 1% (superficial only).

It’s important to note that the majority of the changes made were nursing driven or nursing influenced. Surgical site infection prevention is multi-dimensional and is most effective when all significant parties – patients, nurses and providers – are brought together to affect change.


South County Hospital's Best Practice Care Bundle

Emerson Hospital Leverages Technology to Improve Patient Experience

Leadership rounding at the bedside – the process where nurse leaders, administrators, and others talk directly with staff and patients about care and services – is a best practice in most hospitals, yet it comes with many challenges. It can be time consuming and difficult to standardize. When rounding is done using a pen and paper, how can care teams compile trend data in the department and across the hospital?

Emerson’s care teams wanted to identify a better way to support an excellent patient experience in real time and to track feedback from patients and their families to identify trends. The Emerson team conducted research and discovered CipherHealth’s Orchid rounding tool – an iPad app loaded with best practice questions that supports a structured and real-time approach to rounding at patients’ bedsides.
While nurses regularly check patients’ health and vital signs, nurse leaders are now able to enhance the overall patient experience by obtaining and recording information from patients’ about their entire stay in real time.

“We continually seek opportunities to improve our holistic approach of caring for patients,” said Christine Schuster, president and CEO of Emerson. “When done well, the overall experience patients have at Emerson helps them recover faster and be discharged sooner. Everyone — our patients and our staff caring for patients — benefits from the tool.”

Gaining immediate feedback from patients and their families has allowed Emerson’s teams to make a rapid impact and improve the overall experiences of patients, while they are still in the hospital. In just six months using the tool, Emerson has already seen strong results in positive patient experiences nearly across the board. Its recent HCAHPS score for, “Would you recommend the hospital?” increased nearly three percentage points over last quarter. For “Responsiveness of hospital staff,” its HCAHPS score increased more than four percentage points over last quarter.

Nurse Managers, iPads and Best Practices

In July 2015, Emerson leadership decided to pilot the bedside rounding tool in its medical surgical units. With a grant from the Auxiliary of Emerson Hospital, nurse managers were given iPads loaded with the Orchid tool. Modeled on those used routinely in the hotel and hospitality industry, the tool has best-practice questions, including those about cleanliness of the environment, noise, use of care boards, quality of the food, and pain management, among others.

As nurse managers round on each patient in their rooms and enter information into the app, data is captured and uploaded to a secure database. From the database Emerson creates reports that reflect overall and department trends, response times for service recovery, and executive reports that allow the team to monitor the frequency of rounding by department. In just a few short months Emerson nurse managers have completed nearly 2,000 rounds.

“I can see how many rounds each nurse manager has completed that day. We share the information with our nurse manager team and it creates some healthy competition among the group,” explains Justine DeFronzo, MBA, BSN, RN, associate chief nursing officer at Emerson. “Each of our units wants to be the one to have done the most rounding on patients. But it is not just about quantity – we are really using the app to measure quality of patient care.”

Rapid Service Recovery

Emerson identified key leaders from dietary, environmental services and patient advocacy departments. Observations and patient responses are recorded in the app and any response that requires follow-up is immediately sent to the appropriate department leader who visits the patient to perform service recovery and make any necessary adjustments to address the concerns. If a patient has a more complex concern, the patient advocate responds immediately and works with the patient and teams involved to address it in real time.

During rounds on one of Emerson’s medical surgical units, the nurse manager discovered that a diabetic patient who follows a very strict cultural diet was waiting for his family to prepare and deliver his meals. As a result, his blood sugars were not regulated and his family was feeling the stress of having to prepare his meals. When the nurse asked this patient about his satisfaction with the food, he revealed that he was not eating the hospital-prepared meals due to his cultural diet. Via the app, the nurse manager alerted the director of dietary services who immediately came to the patient’s room to follow up. The situation was remedied and a culturally appropriate diet was ordered for the patient. The patient’s dietary schedule was back on track, his blood sugars normalized, and the family was relieved.

Another patient was asked by a nurse leader during the rounding: “Is there anything about your room that needs attention?” The patient responded that the floors in her room felt sticky even after being washed. The nurse leader used the rounding tool to send an alert to the manager of housekeeping. Within minutes, he came to the patient’s room, spoke to the patient, examined the floors and determined that the cleaning solution was not mixed properly. The issue was corrected within an hour throughout the hospital.

“When a patient is having a service issue, they don’t have to wait for it to be resolved,” explains Pat Wheeler, RN, MBA, Emerson’s senior director, quality and patient safety. “Once it is corrected, the manager shares the experience with the team so the issue can be prevented in the future.”

Just-in-Time Training and Increased Morale

As nurse managers round and they come across opportunities for improvement, they share the feedback immediately with their staff and work through solutions. A good example of this has to do with care boards – the whiteboards that all patients have in their room that display personalized information about their care. The boards are a best practice for effective communication.

Using the tool, data revealed that care boards were often incomplete; clinicians’ names and goals for the day were not always updated. Nurse managers worked with their teams to reinforce the importance of updated care boards. Compliance with care board use is now 100%, up significantly from 22% just six months’ ago.

The question in the app, “Is there someone you would like me to say thank you to for providing exceptional service during your stay?” frequently generates a positive response from patients. “When my nurses see positive patient feedback, it gives them a tremendous feeling,” said Maria Balboni, RN, nurse manager. “The positive feedback in real time is always much appreciated by the staff. It is a great motivator to always go further for our patients.”

Understanding Root Causes and Making Positive Change

As Emerson recognizes trends in the data – such as patients’ concerns about noise in the hospital increasing at certain times – the team can add questions to the app to understand the root cause of the problem. Emerson discovered that food delivery carts created an increase in noise during some key rest times. Working with the nutrition department, the team was able to schedule some food carts at different times, which helped reduce noise and enable patients to rest easier.

Tool Benefits Patients and Process Improvements Throughout Hospital

Based on the success of Emerson’s first six months using the app with nurse leaders, the hospital is planning to use it for executive rounding. “Imagine our CEO or CFO coming into a patient’s room to find out how their stay is. That is the level of care we strive to give to each of our patients. Our executives are looking forward to using it to engage with patients, get a pulse on their experience, see first-hand how service recovery works at Emerson, and help establish new processes based on trend reports to further improve on patient satisfaction,” explains Joyce Welsh, RN, MS, Emerson’s vice president for patient care services and CNO.

 

RI’s Kent Hospital Advances the Culture of Safety

Kent Hospital’s Good Catch Award is a way to demonstrate the hospital’s commitment to keeping patients, visitors and employees safe by rewarding those individuals who "speak up" to prevent harm and improve the culture of safety. The Good Catch Award creates positive incentives for providers and staff to report patient safety events.

Kent Hospital’s staff strives continuously to enhance the culture of safety and realizes the importance of recognizing individuals who promote safety. High-reliability organizations de-stigmatize failure. Medical errors that are detected and corrected before harming patients are called near-misses. High-reliability organizations treat these events differently from other hospitals. They encourage employees to come forward with near-misses and they focus on which processes and safeguards work best.

A near miss or a "Good Catch" is an error that happened but did not reach the patient, thereby avoiding any patient harm. These errors are captured and corrected either through staff awareness or designed system controls that have been put into place. Kent Hospital recognizes that good systems equal good outcomes and the Good Catch Award program supports this philosophy.

Risk Management and the hospital’s dedicated Management Team review and investigate all reported safety events daily. The investigations provide Kent the opportunity to identify systems or human factor variables to ensure that a similar event doesn’t occur again. Extensive research has shown that most events, both serious and catastrophic, were preceded by warnings or near-miss events. Reporting near miss-events is important to Kent Hospital, as these events occur usually at a much higher rate than actual events.

Risk Management tracks and trends all patient safety event data from the hospital’s electronic safety event reporting system – Quantros. That data, as well as lessons learned, is shared among senior leaders and other interdisciplinary team members at the weekly Performance Improvement and Patient Safety Committee (PIPS) meeting. At each weekly PIPS meeting, Kent Hospital’s management team members collectively review near-miss events in an effort to determine where there is a potential to improve current processes, procedures, and practices. By identifying areas of opportunity, the organization has a better chance of assuring positive outcomes by preventing similar occurrences from happening again.

Since the inception of the Good Catch Program in June 2016, the numbers of near-miss events that have been reported into Quantros have increased significantly. Remember: recognizing and reporting near misses – as opposed to ignoring them – is a positive trend to help improve systems and improve patient safety. To date Kent Hospital has awarded 136 Good Catch awards.

Here are just a few examples of near-miss events:

Near Miss: RN noted Heparin drip order set in Cerner was automatically changing the initial lab draw post initiation. This was a near miss event as it could have led to a delay and/or an omission in the initial post anti- factor Xa resulting in patient harm.

Actions: Heparin Nomogram in Cerner updated; initial 6 hour anti- factor Xa (after the start of infusion) is now automatically pre-checked for drawing by the lab.

Near Miss: RN noted there was 2g Magnesium in the 125mg Cardizem pockets of the Pyxis machines; both have similar packaging and are stored next to each other in the Pyxis.   

Actions: Labels were placed on the Cardizem bags to differentiate them  from the Magnesium in the pharmacy storage bins. The Cardizem and  Magnesium vials were relocated to different drawers in all of the Pyxis machines.

Near Miss: CNA noted that the shower heads in rehab could easily shoot off the nozzle and potentially injure a patient.

Actions: Risk & Engineering investigated, design flaw of the shower heads noted, and all were changed out to a different model.

Any staff member who makes a “Good Catch” is presented with a Good Catch Award certificate, Good Catch lapel pin, and their picture is taken with Kent Hospital’s leadership team members. In addition, the award recipients have their pictures displayed prominently. The staff member’s name is published in Kent Hospital’s ‘Vital Signs’, which is sent not only to all of Kent Hospital, but also via e-mail to all Care New England employees as well.

At the end of each fiscal year, Kent Hospital nominates recipients for awards that are an extension of this program: The All Star Award (1 winner) and the Golden Glove Awards (1 winner from every clinical and non-clinical department within Kent Hospital). These nominees are presented to our Performance Improvement and Patient Safety Committee for voting. Click the link for Good Catch Program highlights.

AHRQ’s Preventing Hospital Associated VTE Guide

Hospital-associated venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) is a common source of morbidity and mortality. While VTE sometimes occurs despite the best available prophylaxis, there are many lost opportunities to optimize prophylaxis and reduce VTE risk factors in virtually every hospital. This guide targets these failure modes in the process of preventing VTE in the inpatient setting and provides improvement teams with field-tested strategies and tools to enhance their chances of success. Several essential elements are needed to achieve meaningful improvement in VTE prevention. These include an empowered, interdisciplinary team, supported by the institution, to standardize processes, monitor and measure VTE processes and outcomes, implement institutional policies, and educate providers and patients. Guidelines for VTE prevention are numerous and do not always agree, and the complexity of the inpatient setting and the variability of patients make implementation of evidence-based guidelines challenging. This implementation guide reviews several guidelines, with a particular focus on the implications for implementation; it then breaks down the steps to translate these guidelines into practice in the form of a VTE prevention protocol. Read more…

Continue reading “AHRQ’s Preventing Hospital Associated VTE Guide”